Integral Dynamics

August 15, 2007

IDEA - U.S. Weighing Terrorist Label for Iran Guards

NY Times reported, U.S. Weighing Terrorist Label for Iran Guards  (link).

The relevant statement,

Bush administration is preparing to declare that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps is a foreign terrorist organization, senior administration officials said Tuesday.

IDEA of Impact on Open-Ended Isues

United States will act diplomatically with Iran Remote Unlikely Even
Chance
Probably,
Likely
Almost
certainly
New Estimated Assessment _ _ _ _ _
Old _ _ _ _ _

+++

United States will act military against Iran Remote Unlikely Even
Chance
Probably,
Likely
Almost
certainly
New Estimated Assessment _ _ _ _ _
Old _ _ _ _ _

+++

United Nations Security Council will approve a new round of sanctions against Iran Remote Unlikely Even
Chance
Probably,
Likely
Almost
certainly
New Estimated Assessment _ _ _ _ _
Old _ _ _ _ _

This gives the following Key Global Issues Monitor.

Open-Ended Issue Remote Unlikely Even
Chance
Probably,
Likely
Almost
certainly
Al-Qaeda’s global leadership is based in Waziristan, Pakistan          
Al-Qaeda is present in Iraq          
Al-Qaeda will take over Iraq          
Global economy is healthy          
Global oil demand is strong          
Global oil prices will rise          
Global oil supply will drop          
Hezbollah will attack Israel          
Importance of Kurds’ support for Iraq government          
Importance of Kurds’ support for U.S. government          
Iran has a stable regime          
Iran is arming insurgents in Afghanistan          
Iran is building nuclear weapons          
Iran is contributing to worsening security in Iraq          
Iran’s oil revenues are sustainable          
Iran’s oil supply is sustainable and will improve          
Iran will attack Israel          
Iran will freeze it’s uranium enrichment programme          
Iran will take over Iraq          
Iran’s economy is healthy          
Iraq could end up in a regional war          
Iraq’s government is a stable regime          
Iraq’s government is supported political by the Kurds          
Iraq lawmakers will pass the Hydrocarbons Law (aka Oil Law”          
Iraq’s political reconcilation on national level improves          
Iraq restrains PKK’s activities          
Iraq’s security improving          
Iraq will split up into three ethnic/religious regions          
Iraqi Kurds participate in army of Iraq          
Iraqi Kurds seek independence          
Israel will attack Iran          
Long term stability of Persian Gulf          
Pakistan is an Islamic state          
Pakistan can be ‘trusted’ with nuclear weapons          
Pakistan’s public opinion is positive about the United States and Musharraf          
Pakistan’s president is Pervez Musharraf          
Realization of Kurdistan          
Saudi Arabia is arming Sunni militias in Iraq          
Syria allows suicide bombers to cross into Iraq          
Turkey will invade Iraq          
Turkish government is pressured by United States gvt to not attack Iraq          
Turkish PKK is active from North of Iraq          
United Nations Security Council will approve a new round of sanctions against Iran          
United States and Pakistan have a good relationship          
United States’ army is under increasing stress          
United States’ cost of the war in Iraq will increase          
United States’ domestic debate over war in Iraq          
United States economy is healthy          
United States military casualties will increase          
United States president George W. Bush determination to continue the war          
United States restrains PKK’s activities          
United States will stay involved with Iraq          
United States will act diplomatically with Iran          
United States will act military against Iran          
United States will (unilaterally) attack terrorist targets in Pakistan          
Vision of Kurdistan          
Open-Ended Issue Remote Unlikely Even
Chance
Probably,
Likely
Almost
certainly

++++

Probability of events

How to describe the probability of events? We have choosen to use the Estimative Language from the (United States) National Intelligence Esatimates (NEI) The US Intelligence Community also strugles with (source)

judgments pertaining to likelihood are intended to reflect the Community’s sense of the probability of a development or event. Assigning precise numerical ratings to such judgments would imply more rigor than we intend. The [list] below provides a rough idea of the relationship of terms to each other.

Remote —- Unlikely —- Even chance —- Probably, likely —- Almost certainly

We do not intend the term “unlikely” to imply an event will not happen. We use “probably” and “likely” to indicate there is a greater than even chance.
We use words such as “we cannot dismiss,” “we cannot rule out,” and “we cannot discount” to reflect an unlikely—or even remote—event whose consequences are such it warrants mentioning.
Words such as “may be” and “suggest” are used to reflect situations in which we are unable to assess the likelihood generally because relevant information is nonexistent, sketchy, or fragmented.

Likelyhood Indication Description
Remote text remote
Unlikely text Unlikely
Even Chance text Even Chance
Probably, Likely text Probably, Likely
Almost certainly text Almost certainly
Color Indication Description
Green text green
Yellow text yellow
Orange text orange
Red text red

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress