IDEA - Russia Sends Long Bombers Back on Patrol
Associated Press reported that Russia Sends Long Bombers Back on Patrol (link).
Two important statements
Russia and China executed war games on Russia’s soil near the Urals Mountain city of Chelyabinsk.
The war games involved some 6,000 troops from both countries, along with soldiers from four ex-Soviet Central Asian nations that are part of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
Russia’s President Vladimir Putin placed strategic bombers back on long-range patrol.
This is for the first time since the breakup of the Soviet Union.
Both statements signal a growing tension between the united States and Russia, especially regarding Central Asia.
IDEA of this story resulted in the following Open-Ended Issues,
- Central Asia contains vast hydrocarbon resources, with indicators: yellow, almost certainly
- China’s influence in Central Asia grows, with indicators: orange, even chance
- Russia’s influence in Central Asia grows, with indicators: orange, even chance
- Russia increases its military spending, with indicators: orange, almost certainly
- United States‘ influence in Central Asia grows, with indicators: orange, even chance
This gives the following Key Global Issues Monitor.
| Open-Ended Issue | Remote | Unlikely | Even Chance |
Probably, Likely |
Almost certainly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Qaeda’s global leadership is based in Waziristan, Pakistan | |||||
| Al-Qaeda is present in Iraq | |||||
| Al-Qaeda will take over Iraq | |||||
| Central Asia contains vast hydrocarbon resources | |||||
| China’s influence in Central Asia grows | |||||
| Europe has failed to integrate second and third generation immigrants into society, both economically and socially | |||||
| Europe will see more terrorist attacks by Islamic extremists | |||||
| Global economy is healthy | |||||
| Global oil demand is strong | |||||
| Global oil prices will rise | |||||
| Global oil supply will drop | |||||
| Hezbollah will attack Israel | |||||
| Importance of Kurds’ support for Iraq government | |||||
| Importance of Kurds’ support for U.S. government | |||||
| Iran has a stable regime | |||||
| Iran is arming insurgents in Afghanistan | |||||
| Iran is building nuclear weapons | |||||
| Iran is contributing to worsening security in Iraq | |||||
| Iran’s oil revenues are sustainable | |||||
| Iran’s oil supply is sustainable and will improve | |||||
| Iran will attack Israel | |||||
| Iran will freeze it’s uranium enrichment programme | |||||
| Iran will take over Iraq | |||||
| Iran’s economy is healthy | |||||
| Iraq could end up in a regional war | |||||
| Iraq’s government is a stable regime | |||||
| Iraq’s government is supported political by the Kurds | |||||
| Iraq lawmakers will pass the Hydrocarbons Law (aka Oil Law” | |||||
| Iraq’s political reconcilation on national level improves | |||||
| Iraq restrains PKK’s activities | |||||
| Iraq’s security improving | |||||
| Iraq will split up into three ethnic/religious regions | |||||
| Iraqi Kurds participate in army of Iraq | |||||
| Iraqi Kurds seek independence | |||||
| Israel will attack Iran | |||||
| Israel will attack Syria | |||||
| Long term stability of Persian Gulf | |||||
| Pakistan becomes an extrimists Islamic state | |||||
| Pakistan can be ‘trusted’ with nuclear weapons | |||||
| Pakistan’s public opinion is positive about the United States and Musharraf | |||||
| Pakistan’s president is Pervez Musharraf | |||||
| Realization of Kurdistan | |||||
| Russia increases its military spending | |||||
| Russia’s influence in Central Asia grows | |||||
| Saudi Arabia is arming Sunni militias in Iraq | |||||
| Syria allows suicide bombers to cross into Iraq | |||||
| Syria is subject to Iranian control | |||||
| Turkey`s ruling AKP party has strong connections to the “gradualist” wing of the Muslim Brotherhood | |||||
| Turkey`s ruling AKP party is a Hamas sympathizer | |||||
| Turkey will invade Iraq | |||||
| Turkey will join EU | |||||
| Turkish government is pressured by United States gvt to not attack Iraq | |||||
| Turkish PKK is active from North of Iraq | |||||
| United Nations Security Council will approve a new round of sanctions against Iran | |||||
| United States and Pakistan have a good relationship | |||||
| United States’ army is under increasing stress | |||||
| United States’ cost of the war in Iraq will increase | |||||
| United States’ domestic debate over war in Iraq | |||||
| United States economy is healthy | |||||
| United States’ influence in Central Asia grows | |||||
| United States military casualties will increase | |||||
| United States president George W. Bush determination to continue the war | |||||
| United States restrains PKK’s activities | |||||
| United States will stay involved with Iraq | |||||
| United States will act diplomatically with Iran | |||||
| United States will act military against Iran | |||||
| United States will act military against Syria | |||||
| United States will (unilaterally) attack terrorist targets in Pakistan | |||||
| Vision of Kurdistan | |||||
| Open-Ended Issue | Remote | Unlikely | Even Chance |
Probably, Likely |
Almost certainly |
Probability of events
How to describe the probability of events? We have choosen to use the Estimative Language from the (United States) National Intelligence Esatimates (NEI) The US Intelligence Community also strugles with (source)
judgments pertaining to likelihood are intended to reflect the Community’s sense of the probability of a development or event. Assigning precise numerical ratings to such judgments would imply more rigor than we intend. The [list] below provides a rough idea of the relationship of terms to each other.
Remote —- Unlikely —- Even chance —- Probably, likely —- Almost certainly
We do not intend the term “unlikely” to imply an event will not happen. We use “probably” and “likely” to indicate there is a greater than even chance.
We use words such as “we cannot dismiss,” “we cannot rule out,” and “we cannot discount” to reflect an unlikely—or even remote—event whose consequences are such it warrants mentioning.
Words such as “may be” and “suggest” are used to reflect situations in which we are unable to assess the likelihood generally because relevant information is nonexistent, sketchy, or fragmented.
| Likelyhood Indication | Description |
|---|---|
| Remote | text remote |
| Unlikely | text Unlikely |
| Even Chance | text Even Chance |
| Probably, Likely | text Probably, Likely |
| Almost certainly | text Almost certainly |
| Color Indication | Description |
|---|---|
| Green | text green |
| Yellow | text yellow |
| Orange | text orange |
| Red | text red |